Illinois Supreme Court Signals Heightened Standard For Discretionary Immunity

attorney

The Illinois Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that reaffirmed long-standing precedent holding that claims for injuries caused by dangerous conditions on public property are subject to the “discretionary immunity” defense under Sections 2-109 and 2-201 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 10/2-109, 2-201. However, in reversing the lower courts’ award of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-public entity, the Court highlighted the fact-specific application of this defense and emphasized that the burden is on the public entity to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it is entitled to immunity. This opinion signals a heightened evidentiary standard required of public entities who seek discretionary immunity, and serves as an admonishment regarding the critical importance of maintaining written policies and documentation regarding the discretionary functions of their employees.

Click¬†here¬†for a more detailed summary of the Court’s decision.

Categories: 
Related Posts
  • Supreme Court Upholds Private Right of Action for FNHRA Suits: Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski Read More
  • Illinois Appellate Court Finds a Duty to Defend a BIPA Claim under the Media Liability Coverage Section of a Cyber Insurance Policy Read More
  • Notice: Compliance with the IL Open Meetings Act Section 2.02 Read More
/